PS: and if you need an image editor too, I would of course recommand to use our beloved Digikam at the same time.

The mailing-list is open if you have good comments about this issue. For example it you rotate a picture, it will store this information in his XML database, and apply it at runtime. Since it's not an image editor, he never touch original files, you can set your pictures read-only if you want. It can search for multiple tags, including incrementive search, and for comments, but not for exif data for now. You can configure a logo and an image (or enable choosable images so each user can. It allowed me to set quickly information about locations/persons/keywords for my 7 000 pictures, and navigating between them is now very pleasant. KDE is the default desktop environment associated with most Linux. While digikam is a very good application which does well image management and image editing, Kimdaba only does image management but is excellent at doing it. It seems to me that you are looking for KimDaBa. > ability to restrict editing the images. > In my opinion you should be able to search for pictures based on multiple tags, Seems to me he didn't have any plugin installed, so how can he review Digikam (or kimdaba) correctly ?! I'm pretty sure it is in the print wizard plugin. I'm pretty sure my wife could not have done by herself the calendar she has printed, with pictures of our daughter. Ask permission before sending files larger 128 KB via email. Or the rotation not being lossless (It IS lossless if you have kipi-plugins). How do i use xscreensaver with kde - Use my name to fix the extra s in my email address. That's nearly as if all the plugins (kipi-plugins and digikamplugins) where removed when he reviewed digikam.įor examples, he complains about rotating images being slow, I don't know, since at home the option for auto-rotating based on EXIF is activated. for each user to hack GNOME and KDE in order for video players to inhibit screen blanking. Next message: Review Request 127699: Set the xscreensaver plugin as valid only if the dbus interface don't know all the apps, but I know a little of Digikam, as that is what my wife uses (she is not computer literate).Īnd it is evident from this article, that the author took way too little time reviewing at least Digikam (and I guess most other programs too).ĭigikam does nearly (one exception is erasing in-law) all of the things that the author complains it does not. XScreenSaver 6.04 is out now, including iOS and Android.> Tested minimal application using KIdleTime using the xscreensaver plugin.

> src/plugins/xscreensaver/xscreensaverbasedpoller.cpp f56396c > src/plugins/xscreensaver/xscreensaverbasedpoller.h 05b9a23 > If the dbus interface is not present, it makes no sense to use the plugin. > Review request for KDE Frameworks and Martin Gräßlin. > This is an automatically generated e-mail. Stack Exchange network consists of 181 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. On April 20, 2016, 1:54 p.m., Paulo Lieuthier wrote: This is an automatically generated e-mail.

> From that I don't read that it must emit this signal. > given the API documentation I would say yes, that's OK: 'Triggered, if KIdleTime is catching resume events, when the system resumes from an idle state.' > And is it okay if that doesn't work as expected? > The dbus interface is only used to emit a resumeFromIdle when the screen saver deactivated. The dbus interface is only used to emit a resumeFromIdle when the screen saver deactivated. The functionality of that poller implementation is not bound to the availability of the dbus interface, but on the XScreenSaver X11 extension. The thing about The GIMP is that (at least the last time I checked, which was ages ago) it ruled itself out of involvement with GNOME - which. 'Adding restrictions to the KDE framework is just nonsense.

Next message: Review Request 127699: Set the xscreensaver plugin as valid only if the dbus interface is present Removed Xscreensaver because it isnt part of the architecture.

Previous message: Review Request 127699: Set the xscreensaver plugin as valid only if the dbus interface is present.

DEPRECATED: Depends on QT3 unmaintained This port expired on: There is no maintainer for this port. Review Request 127699: Set the xscreensaver plugin as valid only if the dbus interface is present Paulo Lieuthier paulolieuthier at Port details on branch 2020Q4: xscreensaver-kde Support for xscreensaver blankers in KDE 3.5.107 x11 17 3.5.107 Version of this port present on the latest quarterly branch. Review Request 127699: Set the xscreensaver plugin as valid only if the dbus interface is present

Xscreensaver on kde checkered image